Ready or Not California, Hands-free Cell Phone Usage Will Be the Law

It's not a suprise to anyone. Drivers all over the State of California have been told for over a year now the days with a cellphone plastered to their ears while driving are numbered.

Coming this JUL 01, 2008 all users of cell phones must use a hands-free device while driving anywhere in the state, as in on any public road, highway, freeway or interstate. Wired, speaker/mic, Bluetooth... it doesn't matter so long as you can keep both hands on the wheel without being encumbered by holding the phone itself up to your head. I like engadget's take on the issue.

Now if anyone thinks that this will put a definative deterrent on people driving like Highway A-Holes, they are terribly wrong. I see more A-Holes showing up on the highways and byways of this state. I blame the "new cool" factor for the potential upsweep.

But there's another issue.

The experts (whoever they are) say that it's not the action of holding the phone up ot the ear that's been the contributing factor to being unsafe while driving, but rather the actual mental activity of focusing on a caller's voice and responding that really causes the problems associated with driving and cellphone suage. It appears that a driver cannot fully fuction safely while driving and talking on the phone in any way - hand's free or not.

So let's review;

- Driving with a cellphone up to your head while driving is not safe.
- Drivers utilizing a handsfree device to use a cellphone when driving is also not safe.
- The State of California says drivers have to use a handsfree device when using a cellphone.

It's all coming clear now, isn't it?

9 Year Old Boy Dies, and Why the Amber Alert System Sucks

On MAR 19, 2008, a 9 year old boy and his 11 year old friend were playing in a vacant lot near their homes in Bakersfield, CA. Sometime during this happy time the 11 year old ran to his parents and authorities reporting that the 9 year old was shot, and subsequently abducted by, a black clad man driving a dark colored Honda Civic with one white door. Authorities in the area instantly issued an Amber Alert and the statewide electronic sign displays along almost all interstates and major freeways lit up. Amber Alerts, with these electronic signs, provide basic information to highway drivers alerting them to keep and eye out for the car and child, and to report any sightings to the local authorities or California Highway Patrol.

In this particular instance, the original report of the 9 year old being kidnapped was very much incorrect. A few hours later it was determined the poor lad had been playing in the vacant lot with the 11 year old in a tunnel they were digging under a derelict concrete slab, leftover from an old construction. As the 9 year old was inside this tunnel it collapsed, trapping the boy under many hundreds of pounds of earth and concrete pieces. A tragedy for sure, especially since the 11 year old initially panicked and told an un-truth about what really happened to the 9 year old - that is the 9 year old being shot and abducted - and not a victim of earthen entrapment. The 9 year old perrished under the tunnel collapse. Perhaps if the 11 year old had told the truth about what happened right up front the 9 year old could have been saved. We will perhaps never know. Our hearts go out to the 9 year old's parents, family and friends for his passing.

But what allows this sad story to be doccumented here isn't what the two boys were doing, or the actions of the 11 year old to not tell anyone what really happened until it was too late. What make this one filed under HIGHWAY A-HOLE status, is that the people who run the Amber Alert system totally fell down in managing the info to the highway motorists. How you ask? Read on.

The 11 year old reported the false shooting and abduction to Bakersfield authorities between 10:15 am and 10:30 am. The Amber Alert for the "abduction" was on the highway message boards by 10:45 am. Local news agencies had the story on the wire services and local TV news by 12:00 noon.

The sad relevation as to what really happened to the 9 year old was confirmed by approximately 3:05 pm as his body was located and excavated in quick time by urban rescue teams from Kern County, the county Bakersfield is in.

The problem however, is that the Amber Alert remained up and on display throughout the Southern half of CA until 7:20pm - that's over four hours AFTER the 9 year old was recovered, which is when the Amber Alerts should have been cancelled and removed from the highway sign displays.

When an Amber Alert is displayed on these very large, very bright highway signs, cars passing always slow down to read them. This causes traffic to slow to a speed one half of normal way before, to just past, the Amber Alert displays. When an Amber Alert is displayed during one of Southern CA's rush hours - like between 4:00 pm and 7:00 pm - traffic flow is destroyed to a very slow crawl.

Now I can totally understand displaying Amber Alert messages during rush hour if there is truely an active abduction in process. The authorities should do whatever possible to find abductors and abductees. But when an incident has been resolved for a period of time nearly longer than the total running time of the films "Ben Hur" or "The Ten Commandments" combined it's un-excusable.

I think that for not performing due dilligentce to the law agencies involved in the tragedy, as well as to Southern CA commuting drivers, the people who run the Amber Alert system should be considered, for at least one day this week, Highway A-Holes.

Also, thanks to the falsely extended Amber Alert, my commute from Sunset Blvd N to the 101 freeway W, a distance of less than 6 miles, took 1h 9m to complete. It normally takes about 16 minutes to travel the same distance that same time of day.